Glacial Geology and Geomorphology, 1999
http://boris.qub.ac.uk/ggg/papers/full/1999/rp011999/rp01.html

Three-dimensional reconstruction of Younger Dryas glaciers with a raster-based GIS

RUDOLF SAILER
Institut für Geographie
Universität Innsbruck
Innrain 52
A-6020 Innsbruck
Austria
rudolf.sailer@uibk.ac.at
HANNS KERSCHNER
Institut für Geographie
Universität Innsbruck
Innrain 52
A-6020 Innsbruck
Austria
ARMIN HELLER
Institut für Geographie
Universität Innsbruck
Innrain 52
A-6020 Innsbruck
Austria

Table of Contents

  • Abstract
  • Key Words
  • Introduction
  • Research Area
  • Moraines in the Schönferwall - Ochsental valley
  • Reconstruction of the glacier surface
  • GIS based reconstruction of the glacier tongue
  • Application of the model to Younger Dryas glaciers of the Schönferwall valley
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
  • List of Figures
  •  

    Abstract

    Glacier surfaces and equilibrium line altitudes (ELA) are reconstructed from Younger Dryas moraines (Egesen Stadial) in the Ferwall group (western Austria). Traditional manual reconstruction and a raster-based Geographical Information System (GIS) are used. The interactive GIS-based reconstruction uses the theoretical profile of a glacier tongue for the glacier tongue and a constant shear stress model for the cirque areas. A Digital Terrain Model with 20 m grid mesh width provides the geometrical basis to the GIS. Moraines and other ice marginal features are used as input data. The results of the manual and computer based reconstruction agree surprisingly well. Therefore, the calculated shear stress values and ELAs should be reliable. Shear stresses range between 1.23 bars for the Egesen maximum (early Younger Dryas) and 0.39 bars for the Egesen III advance (late Younger Dryas). Equilibrium line depressions relative to the mid-19th century maximum range between -290 m and -120 m respectively. In total, the GIS-supported models based on simple glaciological theory seem to be reliable tools for the reconstruction of former glacier surfaces.

     

    Key Words

    Glacier reconstruction, Alps, GIS, Equilibrium line, moraines,Younger Dryas

    Introduction

    Equilibrium lines of Lateglacial glaciers are important sources for palaeoclimatic information, because the equilibrium line altitude (ELA) of a glacier is entirely determined by climatic factors (cf. Kuhn 1979, 1989; Ohmura et al. 1992). If some other independent palaeotemperature information is available on a comparable timescale and temporal resolution, then they can be used to infer Late Glacial precipitation patterns in High Mountains (Kerschner 1985; Kaser and Kerschner 1994). These, in turn, can be used as benchmarks to test the reliability of Atmospheric General Circulation Models (AGCM). In the case of the Younger Dryas climatic fluctuation, this has been done recently by Renssen (1997). As the ELA is very sensitive to changes in the climatic environment, it must be determined with a rather high degree of accuracy (±20 m). This level of accuracy can usually only be reached with the ablation area ratio (AAR) method (Gross et al. 1978; Kerschner 1990), using an AAR of 0.67. A careful and accurate reconstruction of the glacier surface with contour line intervals of 100 m is necessary to apply the AAR method successfully. Until now, this has usually been done manually, using the relevant moraines and bedrock morphology as guidelines. If a sufficient number of lateral moraines are available, the manual reconstruction of a glacier tongue poses no real problems, and therefore the method has been widely used in the Alps during the past two decades (cf. Maisch 1987, 1995; Kerschner 1985). However, if lateral moraines are few or completely missing, the manual reconstruction of the former glacier surface is difficult and, sometimes, even impossible. The aim of our paper is to show a possible way for a semi-automatic reconstruction of glacier tongues in valleys with 'simple' bedrock morphology with a Geographic Information System (GIS) using ARC/INFO software. Morphometric parameters of the glacier bed (valley slope, cross profiles of the valley, position of end moraines), which are easy to determine, are used as input data. A Digital Terrain Model (DTM) with a grid mesh width of 20 m is used for the calculations.

    This semi-automatic model leads to a reconstruction of former glaciers which is largely independent of the experience of the scientist. The few input parameters coupled with the model algorithms govern the reconstruction routine and lead to reproducible results. The three-dimensional glacier model delivers some interesting glaciological quantities as cross-section, ice thickness or shear stress at any required cross profile along the glacier tongue.

    Research area

    Our research area is the Ferwall group. It is situated at the western margin of the Tyrolean central Alps (Fig. 1). In the north, it is bordered by the Stanzertal, Arlberg pass and Klostertal, in the south by the Paznauntal and in the west by the Montafon valley. In the east, the highest peaks are around 3000 m, whereas the highest peaks in the west are considerably lower (2600 - 2650 m). Valleys in the north and west are usually several kilometres long and of simple geometry. In the south, short and steep valleys lead down from the large cirque areas to the Paznauntal. At the border between the central and the western part of the Ferwall group, wide and open mountain passes ('Winterjöcher') are a characteristic geomorphological feature. Due to its topo-graphic characteristics, the Ferwall group is a very convenient area for our goals, as diffi-culties due to the geometry of the valleys are minimal (straight long profiles without abrupt changes in slope; Fig. 2). As the mountains are mainly com-posed of metamorphic rock (various gneisses, amphibolites), the general morphology is readily comparable to that of the type localities of the Alpine Late Glacial in the Stubai Mountains (Mayr and Heuberger 1968). Therefore, the morphostratigraphic correlation of the Late Glacial moraines with the type localities is easy. Glacial deposits in the Ferwall have been mapped several times in the past (Ampferer 1929; Bobek 1933; Reithofer 1931, 1933, 1934; Senaclens-Grancy 1956; Kerschner 1977; Fraedrich 1979; Eberhard 1987). However, according to our present-day knowledge, even the most recent investigations are not complete and the stratigraphic positioning of the moraines and related deposits is in many cases not correct.

    Moraines in the Schönferwall - Ochsental valley

    The Schönferwall and Ochsental valley is situated at the border between the western and central part of the Ferwall group. A series of prominent lateral and end moraines can be found (Fig. 3). Generally, they are well preserved and, in some places, there are many large boulders. According to their position in the field and their 'fresh' appearance (well preserved, steep slopes, many large boulders), they can be classified as moraines of the Egesen Stadial in the sense of Heuberger (1966, 1968), which is the equivalent to the Younger Dryas climatic fluctuation (e.g. Patzelt 1972; Kerschner 1978a; Müller et al. 1981; Ivy-Ochs et al. 1995, 1996, Ivy-Ochs1996). The maximum advance reached the confluence of Schönferwall and Fasul valleys. During that phase a dendritic glacier system existed, covering most of the southwestern part of the Ferwall group. A correlation with the well-dated Egesen moraines at Julier pass in neighbouring Switzerland (Ivy-Ochs et al. 1995, 11996, Ivy-Ochs1996) is easily possible. From this point of view, the moraines at Konstanzer Hütte were deposited during the earlier part of the Younger Dryas (ca 12.000 cal. BP). There are many more moraines at Silbertaler Winterjoch (Winterjoch i.e. winter col), which indicate that many phases of advance and retreat followed after the maximum, thus demonstrating the 'flickering switch' of Late Glacial climatic change (Taylor et al. 1993). During a distinct second phase of the Egesen Stadial the glacier terminated at the southern end of Silbertaler Winterjoch. We assume that it could be the equivalent of the Bocktentälli phase (Maisch 1981). During a third phase prominent lateral moraines were deposited just below Gaschurner Winterjoch (Fig. 3 and 4). The respective end moraine can be found near the Schönferwall Hütte. Finally, end moraines and lateral moraines in the upper part of Ochsental valley can be correlated with the Kromer/Kartell advance (Fraedrich 1979; Gross et al. 1978), which could be of early Preboreal age. Dating of the moraines with cosmogenic radionuclides is in progress.


    During the colder phases of the Holocene, small glaciers existed in some cirques and at the very end of Ochsental. Lichenometric checking shows that most of the moraines were deposited during the 1850 (Little Ice Age) advance. Today, only three small patches of ice exist in the upper part of Ochsental.

     

    Reconstruction of the glacier surface

    An accurate map of the glacier surface with a scale of at least 1:25000 and with contour lines at 100 m intervals is needed to determine the ELA of a glacier with the AAR method. Traditionally, this has been done by hand with the help of the moraines and some implicit assumptions about ice thickness in the accumulation areas, where moraines are missing. However, this approach is rather subjective and the results depend to a large extent on personal experience. For a more objective approach, the theoretical long profile of a glacier tongue by Nye (1952, Fig. 5) can be used to calculate the ice thickness in a valley, if the glacier length and some parameters governing the shear stress along the valley walls are known (Kerschner 1978b). Considering the static equilibrium of a glacier tongue with the surface slope a resting on an inclined valley floor with slope b and the boundary condition a > b, the relation between glacier length x and glacier thickness h is (Nye 1952):

    x = (h'0 / b 2) ln (h'0 / (h'0 - b h)) - h / b       (1)

    where

    h'0 = t' / (r g)           (2)

    with r as the density of ice (900 kg/m3) and g the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2). In equation (2), t ' is the basal shear stress of the glacier in the valley. It is calculated as

    t '= t / c          (3)

    where the shear stress is

    t = r g h sin a (4)         (4)

    In equation (3), c is a constant which can be calculated from the hydraulic radius R of the cross section of a glacier as

    c = R / h           (5)

    on the assumption that the geometry of the valley remains constant or changes only very slowly. This is the case in Schönferwall and Ochsental valley. In the future, the assumption of a constant hydraulic radius will be replaced by the shape factor for a parabolic cross section (Nye 1965, cf. Paterson 1994).

    All necessary parameters for equation (1) can be calculated from the topographical data contained in the Digital Terrain Model (DTM). Therefore, this approach is well suited for a GIS based reconstruction of former glacier tongues. Details are provided in the appendix. The glacier length at a given point can be determined from end moraines, glacier thickness and surface slope from lateral moraines. Although Nye's (1952) theoretical long profile does not account for longitudinal stresses due to changes in the bed topography, the results are in good agreement with the manual reconstruction from the moraines only.

    The manual reconstruction of the upper parts of a glacier is usually more complicated and prone to errors, because moraines are missing and assumptions about the ice thickness have to be made. The outlines of the glacier in the cirque areas are usually fixed by the bedrock topography. This can easily be done by hand. For the determination of the ice thickness in the accumulation area, a constant basal shear stress is used. In that case, equation (4) contains two unknowns, h and a . However, recent investigations on the ice thickness and bedrock topography of various glaciers in the Ötztal (Massimo 1997) have shown that there is a reasonably good relationship between surface slope a and bedrock slope b. Regression analysis of the data from Gepatschferner shows that the difference between a and b can be expressed as a linear relation of b, which has the form

    a - b = ds = 4.34 - 0.82 b           (6)

    with a correlation coefficient of -0.83 (all angles in degrees). This is statistically sufficient to reconstruct the glacier in the cirque area, because the largest deviations occur where b is steep and h is, therefore, small. Additionally, the topography of Gepatschferner is complicated with several confluences and subglacial basins. Therefore, equation (6) can be rather safely applied to glaciers with simple topography, as is the case in Schönferwall and Ochsental. Then, under the assumption of a constant shear stress, the ice thickness for any single grid point can be calculated from (4) and (6) as

    h = t / [r g sin (b + d s)]          (7)

     

    GIS based reconstruction of the glacier tongue

    All parameters needed for the reconstruction of the glacier tongue can be taken either from the DTM or from topographical maps. Surface slope a and bed slope b, the position of the relevant valley cross profiles and the altitude of the ice surface at the starting point for the reconstruction are chosen interactively. For Lateglacial glaciers, moraines and other ice marginal features provide the necessary information. The surface geometry for the calculation of the hydraulic radius R and the ice thickness h at the starting point are calculated from the DTM.

    In most cases, reconstruction is done in the downvalley direction (Fig. 5 and 6). Equation (1) is the basis for all calculations. Starting from a given cross profile with known values for h, a and b, the glacier length x is calculated from (1). This step also determines the glacier terminus, which remains fixed. Then the cross profile is moved downvalley for n steps with

    n = x / M          (8)

    where M is the grid mesh width. For each step, the ice thickness hn, the hydraulic radius Rn, the surface slope an and the altitude of the glacier surface Hn is calculated, where the distance xn from the starting point is

    x'i = M * i, i=1,..,n           (9)

    the change in ice thickness is

    D hi = hi-1 - hi        (10)

    and the altitude of the glacier surface follows as

    Hi =Hi-1 - D hi - tan b * x'i         (11)

    In most cases, the cross section to start with is located below the position of the equilibrium line. Therefore, the glacier surface altitude is also calculated upvalley as

    Hi =Hi-1 - D hi   + tan b * x'i           (12)

    In that case, Dhi  is negative and the altitude of the ice surface increases. When Hi   reaches an altitude where the equilibrium line is supposed to be the iteration terminates. From there on, the ice surface is calculated with a simple constant shear stress model.

     

    GIS based reconstruction of cirque areas


    The calculated shear stress of the glacier tongue is used to calculate the ice surface in the cirque areas of the glaciers. In a first step, the probable surface slope is calculated with the help of equation (6) from the bed slope b as:

    a = b + d s           (13)

    Then the ice thickness h and finally the altitude of the glacier surface H can be calculated from the shear stress equation (equation 4). Any influence of the valley walls is disregarded, as glacier width is usually very large compared with the ice thickness. However, using a DTM with a grid mesh width of 20 m results in a very irregular pattern of the contour lines. Therefore, the calculated surface slope is smoothed twice using a 7 x 7 pixel surrounding (140 m x 140 m) for each pixel and using the mean value of all according pixels. This is roughly equivalent to three to five times the ice thickness in cirque areas.

     

    Application of the model to Younger Dryas glaciers of the Schönferwall valley

    The model has been developed to reconstruct the Younger Dryas Glaciers of the Ferwall valleys. The numerical reconstruction of the Egesen I and III glaciers are good in accordance with the manually reconstructed ('conventional') glacier topographies (Fig. 7 and 8). The ELA of the Egesen I glacier is exactly the same (2320 m) for the manual and the GIS-based reconstruction. For the Egesen II substadial, a numerical reconstruction was impossible, because the necessary input data could not be determined due to a lack of lateral moraines. The manually reconstructed ELA of the Egesen II glacier is 2420 m. A first conventional attempt to calculate the ELA of the Egesen III glacier resulted in a value of 2480 m, which was 35 m higher than the value derived from the GIS-based model. A closer inspection showed that the manually drawn contour lines of the glacier surface at the tongue / cirque transition caused an unrealistic ice thickness in this specific part of the glacier. A further conventional reconstruction resulted in an ELA of 2450 m, which is only 5 m higher than the GIS-modelled value of 2445 m.


    ELAs and D ELAs relative to the LIA (1850 AD; cf. Fig. 3) maximum for the reconstructed glaciers are in the order of 2320 m/-290 m for the Egesen Maximum, 2420 m / -190 m for the halt at Silbertaler Winterjoch (Egesen II) and 2450 m / -160 m for the Egesen III advance, which is documented by distinct moraines (Fig. 4). The depression values are rather similar to those in other more oceanic areas of the Eastern Alps and typical for the Younger Dryas (cf. Kerschner 1985, 1993). The ELA depression for the Kartell stadial in the upper part of Ochsental is -90 m, which is the same as at the type locality (Fraedrich 1979). Actual shear stresses are 0.69 bars for the maximum and only 0.2 bars for the Egesen III glacier. Disregarding the influence of the valley walls, the respective figures (equation 3) are 1.23 and 0.39 bars. While the larger values are similar to those of modern glaciers of similar size, the shear stresses for the Egesen III glacier are surprisingly small. However, as the glacier tongue is well documented by numerous moraines, they must be regarded as realistic. They can tentatively be interpreted as characteristic for a glacier in a cold and fairly dry environment, as it was typical for the latter half of the Younger Dryas.

    Discussion

    Although the present results are promising, there are still a few critical points remaining to discuss. Above all, the calculated shear stress of a glacier and, therefore, the theoretical long profile of a glacier tongue by Nye (1952) is extremely sensitive to changes in surface slope. If surface slope data are taken from moraines in the field, this can lead to difficulties, because the present-day position of Lateglacial moraines is often the result of hillslope processes. Careful geomorphologic mapping is therefore an absolute necessity.


    If the correct figures for the surface slope and/or the bed slope cannot be determined with the necessary accuracy, it is still possible to use the theoretical long profile in many cases to calculate minimum and maximum glacier lengths from field data under the assumption of realistic shear stresses. If only the terminal position of a glacier is known from end moraines, it is possible to calculate the thickness of the glacier tongue with a reasonable degree of accuracy (±20 m). This can be particularly useful for ELA estimates, because the ELA does not vary considerably unless changes in glacier length or ice thickness are very large. At least, realistic ELAs can be bracketed with a known inaccuracy.


    Two glaciological problems are still unsolved. The first problem relates to the very front of the glacier tongue. The theoretical model (Nye 1952) delivers too high amounts for the ice thickness at the end of the tongue. In the GIS-based model, this problem is solved by a simple logarithmic decay of the ice thickness downvalley from an interactively chosen cross-section near the end. The second remaining problem relates to the usually convex shape of the glacier tongue. To approximate the shape of the glacier tongue, an increase of the ice thickness from the margin to the centre in the order of a few percent is integrated in the model, based on empirical values. Although both solutions are not satisfying from a glaciological point of view, the results are accurate enough to pursue the main goal of the GIS-based model, which is to find reliable ELAs of Lateglacial glaciers. Due to the very limited effect on the glacier topography and on the ELA, the mechanisms of extending and compressive flow are not incorporated in the GIS-based model.


    Finally, as the basal shear stress is the only stress variable in the model, its application is limited to valleys with simple topography and more or less constant cross section. Complex glaciers, or glaciers which are situated in valleys with abrupt changes in geometry, can still only be reconstructed manually. The same is true for the accumulation areas, which must be delimited by hand. However, if the criteria are met, the interactive GIS - based approach seems to be a reliable tool for the reconstruction of glacier surfaces. The calibration of the GIS-based model with glaciers where both the surface and the bed topography are known, has already been done but is not published yet. The preliminary results show a good agreement of the calculated quantities with the quantities derived from maps.

     

    Conclusions

    The theoretical method to calculate long profiles of glaciers with a raster based GIS is the basis of a computer aided model which offers new perspectives for the reconstruction of former ELAs. In the accumulation area (i.e. cirque area) the constant shear stress model based on equations (6) and (13) is helpful in any case. Most manual input has to been done where the glacier tongue passes into the cirque area. Apart from the glacier tongue / cirque area transition, the GIS-based processing is independent of the experience of the scientist. Thus, the principal advantage of the GIS-based model over the conventional reconstruction of glacier topographies is a higher degree of objectivity and reproducibility of the results.
    In general, the model is restricted to glaciers with a geometrically simple bed topography and a geometrically simple catchment area. Only in very special cases it is possible to reconstruct dendritic glacier systems, which is very time-consuming. In general the time necessary for the GIS-based processing is not very different from that for the conventional reconstruction. However, it offers a reliable tool to check the manually drawn surface contour lines of former glaciers.


    The application of the model to Egesen Stadial (Younger Dryas) glaciers of the Schönferwall valley (Ferwall group, Western Central Alps, Austria) show a good agreement between GIS-based and manually reconstructed ELAs, long profiles and glacier extents. The differences are surprisingly small. This supports the assumption that the GIS-based reconstruction gives indeed realistic results and can be applied to other glaciers as well.
    In contrast to dynamic flow models, which are based on specific balance profiles, the GIS-based model works without any information about the mass balance gradients of former glaciers, which usually are not available. As all geometric values of the glacier are stored in a data base, all quantities (i.e. cross section area, ice thickness, glacier width, shape factor, bed and surface slope) are readily available to form the basis for palaeoclimatic interpretations as described by Kerschner et al. (in press).

     

    Acknowledgements

    We would like to acknowledge the fruitful discussion on glaciological topics with our colleagues Marius Massimo, Norbert Span (both at the Institut für Meteorologie, Universität Innsbruck) and Georg Kaser (Institut für Geographie, Universität Innsbruck). The comments of two anonymous reviewers were most helpful during the final stages of the manuscript. The project was supported by the Austrian "Fond zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung" under grant No. P12600-GEO. This support gratefully acknowledged.



    References

    Ampferer, O. 1929 Über die Ablagerungen der Schlußeiszeit in der Umgebung des Arlbergpasses. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 79, 307 - 332.


    Bobek, H. 1933 Die Deutung der Schottervorkommen im Ferwall- und Schönferwalltal. Verhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 1933, 51-59.


    Eberhard, M. 1987 Entwicklung von Sedimentation, Flora, Fauna, Klima und Relief von Mittel-miozän bis Quartär zwischen Arlberg (Vorarlberg/Tirol) und Adelegg (Allgäu). Dissertation ETH Zürich, unpublished.


    Fraedrich, R. 1979 Spät- und postglaziale Gletscherschwankungen in der Ferwallgruppe (Tirol/Vorarlberg). Düsseldorfer Geographische Schriften ,12, 161 pp.


    Gross, G., Kerschner, H. and Patzelt, G.1978 Methodische Untersuchungen über die Schneegrenze in alpinen Gletschergebieten. Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 12, 223 - 251.

    Heuberger, H. 1966 Gletschergeschichtliche Untersuchungen in den Zentralalpen zwischen Sellrain und Ötztal. Wissenschaftliche Alpenvereinshefte, 20, 126 pp.


    Heuberger, H. 1968 Die Alpengletscher im Spät- und Postglazial. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart,19, 270 - 275.


    Ivy-Ochs, S., Schlüchter, C. , Kubik, P.W. and Beer, J. 1995 Das Alter der Egesen-Moräne am Julierpass. Geowissenschaften, 13, 313-315.


    Ivy-Ochs, S., Schlüchter, C., Kubik, P.W., Synal, H.-A., Beer, J. and Kerschner, H.1996 The ex-posure age of an Egesen moraine at Julier Pass, Switzerland, measured with the cosmo-genic radio-nuclides 10Be, 26Al and 36 Cl. Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae, 89, 1049 - 1063.


    Ivy-Ochs, S. 1996 The dating of rock surfaces using in situ produced 10Be, 26Al and 36Cl, with examples from Antarctica and the Swiss Alps. Zürich: Diss. ETH No. 11763, 196 pp.


    Kaser, G. and Kerschner, H. 1994 Equilibrium line altitudes of Younger Dryas glaciers in the Alps as paleoclimatic information sources. Annales Geophysicae, 12, Suppl. II, C 386.


    Kerschner, H. 1977 Das Daun- und Egesenstadium in ausgewählten Tälern der Zentralalpen von Nordtirol und Graubünden. Innsbruck: Phil. Diss., 305 pp.


    Kerschner, H. 1978a Untersuchungen zum Daun- und Egesenstadium in Nordtirol und Grau-bün-den (methodische Überlegungen). Geographischer Jahresbericht aus Österreich , 36, 26-49.


    Kerschner, H. 1978b Zur Rekonstruktion eines spätglazialen Gletscherstandes mit Hilfe eines rechnersich ermittelten Zungenlängenprofils. Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie ,14, 119-123 .


    Kerschner, H. 1985 Quantitative paleoclimatic inferences from lateglacial snowline, timberline and rock glacier data, Tyrolean Alps, Austria. Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 21, 363 - 369.


    Kerschner, H. 1990 Methoden der Schneegrenzbestimmung. In H. Liedtke (ed.) Eiszeit-forschung. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 299-311.

    Kerschner, H., Ivy-Ochs, S. and Schlüchter,Ch. In press Paleoclimatic interpretation of the early late-glacial glacier in the Gschnitz valley, Central Alps, Austria. Annals of Glaciology 28.


    Kuhn, M. 1979 Climate and glaciers. In: Sea Level, Ice and Climatic Change (Proceedings of the Canberra Symposium), IAHS Publ. 131, 3- 20.


    Kuhn, M. 1989 The response of the equilibrium line altitude to climate fluctuations: theory and obser-vations. In: H. Oerlemans (ed.), Glacier Fluctuations and Climatic Change, 407-417.


    Maisch, M. 1981 Glazialmorphologische und gletschergeschichtliche Untersuchungen im Gebiet zwischen Landwasser- und Albulatal (Kt. Graubünden, Schweiz). Physische Geographie, 3, 215 pp.


    Maisch, M. 1987 Zur Gletschergeschichte des alpinen Spätglazials: Analyse und Interpretation von Schneegrenzdaten. Geographica Helvetica 42, 63-91.


    Maisch, M. 1995 Gletscherschwundphasen im Zeitraum des ausgehenden Spätglazials (Egesen-Stadium) und seit dem Hochstand von 1850 sowie Prognosen zum künftigen Eisrückgang in den Alpen. In: Gletscher im ständigen Wandel. Jubiläums-Symposium der Schweizerischen Gletscher-kommission 1993 Verbier (VS), 81-101.


    Massimo, M. 1997 Eisdicke des Gepatschferners. Messumgen mit dem Radio - Echolot. Innsbruck: Diploma Thesis Meteorology, 87 pp.


    Mayr, F. and Heuberger, H. 1968 Type Areas of Late Glacial and Post Glacial deposits in Tyrol, Eastern Alps. In G.M. Richmond (ed.), Glaciation of the Alps. University of Colorado Studies in Earth Sciences, 7, 143 - 165.


    Müller, H.N., Kerschner, H. and Küttel, M. 1981 Gletscher- und vegetationsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen im Val de Nendaz (Wallis) - ein Beitrag zur alpinen Spätglazialchronologie. Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie, 16, 61 - 84.


    Nye, J.F. 1952 A comparison between the theoretical and the measured long profile of the Unter-aar Glacier. Journal of Glaciology, 2, 103 - 107 .


    Nye, J. F. 1965 The flow of a glacier in a channel of rectangular, elliptic or parabolic cross-section. Journal of Glaciology, 5, 661 - 690.


    Ohmura, A., Kasser, P. and Funk, M. 1992 Climate at the equilibrium line of glaciers. Journal of Glaciology, 38, 397 - 411


    Paterson, W.S.B. 1994 The Physics of Glaciers (3rd Edition). Pergamon.


    Patzelt, G. 1972 Die spätglazialen Stadien und postglazialen Schwankungen von Ostalpengletschern. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 85, 47-57.


    Reithofer, O. 1931 Über den Nachweis von Interglazialablagerungen zwischen der Würmeiszeit und der Schlußvereisung im Ferwall- und Schönverwalltal. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt 81, 217 - 236.


    Reithofer, O. 1933 Glazialgeologische Untersuchungen in der Umgebung südlich des Arlbergpasses. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 83, 173-188.


    Reithofer, O. 1934 Über die Schottervorkommen im Ferwall- und Schönferwalltal. Verhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 1934, 70-78.


    Renssen, H. 1997 The climate during the Younger Dryas stadial. Nederlandse Geografische Studies, 217, 183 pp.


    Senarclens-Grancy, W.v. 1956 Zum Spätglazial der mittleren Ferwallgruppe. Carinthia II, Sonderheft, 20, 149 ­ 157.


    Taylor, K.C., Lamorey, G.W., Doyle, G.A., Alley, R.B., Grootes, P.M., Mayewski ,P.A., White, J.W.C. and Barlow L.K. 1993 The 'flickering switch' of late Pleistocene climate change. Nature, 361, 432 ­ 435.

     

     

     

    List of Figures

     


    Fig. 1: Location of the study area. (Click on image to enlarge.)

    (return to text)

     

     

    Fig. 2: Simple bed topography of the upper part of the Schönferwall valley.

    (return to text)

     

     

    Fig. 3: Moraines and glacier extents in the Schönferwall and Ochsental valley.

    (return to text)

     

     

     

    Fig. 4: The prominent lateral moraines of the Egesen III advance below Gaschurner Winterjoch.

     

    (return to text)

     

     

     

     

    Fig. 5: Theoretical long profile of a glacier tongue (Nye 1952); see text for details.


    (return to text)

     

     

     

     

     

    Fig. 6: Cross profile at the start of the GIS-based processing; see text for details.


    (return to text)

     

     

     

     

    Fig. 7: Comparison between the manual and GIS-supported reconstruction of the Egesen III glacier surface. (click on image to magnify)

    (return to text)


     

     

     

    Fig. 8: Long profile of the reconstructed Egesen I glacier with the moraine evidence from geomorphological mapping. (Click on image to enlarge)


    (return to text)

     

    Appendix

    The computer aided model is mainly based on the raster based module GRID of the GIS software ARC/INFO Version 7.1. The GRID module of ARC/INFO offers the advantage of built-in matrix calculations with the possibility to handle each cell, each line and each column seperately.The reconstruction model uses the advanced macro language (AML) of ARC/INFO with a summarized script length of about 2250 lines enriched with short Fortran 77 scripts. The statistical analysis was done with the S-PLUS program package, which is a powerful tool for processing large data sets.
    To compute the DTM from contour lines, the SPANS software was used as well. Regardless of the inadequacy of the according routines the slope and aspect grids (grid is the ARC/INFO synonym for raster files) were also calculated with ARC/INFO. In the GIS-based model it is assumed that the central flow lines follow the rivers. All main program steps are shown in the following flowcharts.